Volume: 9  Number: 4&5  Page: 293–319  doi:10.2167/cit327.0

Tourism and Post-Disciplinary Enquiry

Tim Colesa, C. Michael Hallb and David Timothy Duvalc aCentre for Tourism Studies, School of Business and Economics, University of Exeter, UK, bDepartment of Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand and cDepartment of Tourism, School of Business, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

In recent times there has been discussion about whether studies of tourism are variously a disciplinary, multi-disciplinary or inter-disciplinary pursuit and how these relate to the institutional landscapes and practices of higher education. For some academics, these discourses are somewhat arid, but we would contend they are vital as they serve to set the epistemological terms of references for tourism scholars and play a not insignificant role in orchestrating knowledge production about tourism. This paper revisits some of these concerns relating to disciplinarity, and it suggests that disciplines as we understand them today are an artefact of previous academic divisions of labour which still dominate current institutional regulatory regimes. The purpose of the paper is to suggest that tourism studies would benefit greatly from a post-disciplinary outlook, i.e. a direction ‘beyond disciplines’ which is more problem-focused, based on more flexible modes of knowledge production, plurality, synthesis and synergy. Three possible approaches to the post-disciplinary study of tourism are identified by drawing on lessons from studies of political economy. While post-disciplinary studies of tourism have considerable potential to further our understanding of several major contemporary research themes, their introduction may be frustrated by the tourism academy and frameworks of academic governance.

Keywords: post-disciplinary, tourism studies, institutionalisation, academic disciplines, social sciences

© 2006 T. Coles et al.

Access this article