
Current Issues In Language Planning
Polity Editors: Robert B. Kaplan (University of Southern California), Richard B. Baldauf Jr. (University of Queensland) and Nkonko Kamwangamalu (Howard University)Bob and Dick are also editors of the book series Language Policy and Planning

|
Volume: 6 Number: 2 Page: 102121
|

|
|
|
|
Legislating Literacy for Linguistic and Ethnic Minorities in Contemporary China
|
Minglang Zhou
East Asian Studies, Dickinson College, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, USA
|

|
The Peoples Republic of China has employed two means of literacy promotion: a campaign approach and a legislative approach to meet the needs of nation-state building through education. From 1949 through to the late 1970s, the campaign approach was motivated by a political rationale, but later an economic rationale also became important. From the mid-1980s and continuing to the present, a legislative approach emerged which treats compulsory education as the mainstream means for literacy development and illiteracy eradication as a supplementary one. Meanwhile, Chinas language policy has also changed from allowing parallel development of Chinese literacy and minority literacies to a linguistic hierarchy with Chinese as dominant and minority languages as subordinate. Minorities may challenge this order and in these challenges can be seen differences between national legislation and local legislation. The national laws generally take a permission stance towards literacy in minority languages, whereas local laws adopt stances ranging from promotion to permission to tolerance, with the focus for contesting relative status concentrating on the area of literacy education rather than illiteracy eradication.
Keywords: literacy policy and planning, vernacular literacy, China
©2005 M. Zhou


Access this article
|