
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
Editor: Colin Baker, University of Wales, Bangor Review Editor: Aneta Pavlenko, Temple University, Philadelpia

|
Volume: 10 Number: 5 Page: 663682
doi:10.2167/beb465.0
|

|
|
|
|
Learning through L2 Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) and English as Medium of Instruction (EMI)
|
Ulrich Wannagat
|

|
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) has been promoted by the European Union as a means to achieve multilingualism. While in Germany and other European countries the trend to use the L2 as a medium of instruction is increasing, in Hong Kong, however, we see a converse development. Many schools switched from English as a medium of instruction (EMI) to mother tongue education. The German CLIL concept promotes a gradual and cautious switch to L2 for only a few content subjects in the curriculum. The Hong Kong EMI approach introduces L2 after a short bridging period to most content subjects. Although the CLIL and EMI programmes both share the features of a late immersion programme, their approach to language use in classroom discourse frames is different. The current study was designed to examine the processes and effects of language learning in L2-taught content subjects. Based on samples from two history lessons in the German CLIL and the Hong Kong EMI context, classroom interaction was analysed with special focus on teacher/student talk and codeswitching. First results support the claim that constructive processes during classroom interaction are vital elements of language acquisition.
Keywords: classroom discourse, constructivism, immersion education, Germany, Hong Kong
© 2007 U. Wannagat


Access this article
|